SWOT Scope - AFPS Tracker

Stage 1 scope approval for $competitive-analysis/frameworks/swot. This page proposes the research boundary, source plan, assumptions, and output paths only. It does not contain SWOT findings, competitor rankings, recommendations, a working packet, or a canonical framework artifact.

Statusreview Stage1 scope approval Date2026-06-15 Product pathresearch/afps-tracker Visual tiervisual

Scope Evidence

The active competitive-analysis queue already approved AFPS Tracker as the scoped product path and explicitly excluded exec-loop-tracker. SWOT is the next unchecked framework after the confirmed Porter Five Forces artifact.

Evidence Path Stage 1 Use Boundary Note
Parent competitive-analysis packet research/afps-tracker/_working/preliminary-competitive-analysis-research.md Defines approved AFPS Tracker-only competitive-analysis scope and child framework queue. Scope evidence only; child framework findings remain gated.
Canonical ICP research/afps-tracker/icp.md Defines primary ICP as AFPS power users and AI workflow operators. Strength and weakness evidence in Stage 2 must still be grounded in actual repo/product artifacts.
Confirmed Porter artifact research/afps-tracker/competitive-analysis-porter-five-forces.md Provides approved market boundary and structural source categories. May inform source coverage; SWOT must not simply restate Porter scores.
Progress manifest research/.progress.yaml Shows research/afps-tracker and research/exec-loop-tracker as active paths. This SWOT lane targets only research/afps-tracker.
Current task queue tasks/todo.md Shows SWOT as the next unchecked approved framework. Strategic-group-map, feature-pricing-matrix, and synthesis remain later queued steps.

Proposed SWOT Research Scope

Target Product

AFPS Tracker: a companion sync layer and passive portfolio map for the alignment-first, prototype-second skills workflow.

Primary User Frame

AFPS power users and AI workflow operators managing repo-local research state, alignment pages, product paths, and task context.

SWOT Lens

Strengths and weaknesses from internal product/repo/research evidence; opportunities and threats from market, competitor, customer, and trend evidence.

Explicit Non-Goals

No execution-tracker scope, no positioning recommendation, no product roadmap, and no canonical synthesis in this framework lane.

Internal Evidence repo, ICP, idea brief External Evidence competitors, pricing, users SWOT Matrix gated after approval Stage 2 working packet
Scope/non-goals gate. Should Stage 2 SWOT research use this AFPS Tracker-only scope?

Source Plan

After scope approval, SWOT research should use breadth-first current web search plus repo evidence. Competitor or market facts may not be used as findings unless sourced.

CategoryExamples To SearchLikely SWOT UseEvidence Standard
Repo/product evidenceIdea brief, ICP, parent packet, progress manifest, task history, existing framework artifactsStrengths, weaknesses, scope boundariesPath-cited local artifact observations
Direct alternatives and workaround bundlesManual repo navigation, alignment/index.html, research/.progress.yaml, memory/status filesWeaknesses, threats, substitute pressureRepo evidence and explicit caveats where no external vendor exists
Generic workspaces and project toolsNotion, Linear, Trello, JiraThreats and opportunity contrastVendor pages, docs, pricing, recent updates
Product discovery and research repositoriesJira Product Discovery, Productboard, Dovetail, CondensOpportunities, threats, adjacent WTPVendor pages, pricing, integrations, case studies
AI coding agents and agent-control planesClaude Code, GitHub Copilot, Kiro, Runshift, Linear agentsMarket threats and trend opportunitiesVendor pages, launch notes, docs, user sentiment
User sentiment and community languageDeveloper surveys, forums, product communities, public discussionsOpportunities, threats, confidence caveatsRecent sources preferred; cite limits and uncertainty
Evidence coverage gate. Is this source plan sufficient for Stage 2 SWOT research?

Assumptions And Confidence

AssumptionStatusConfidenceStage 2 Test
AFPS Tracker should stay scoped to research-stage AFPS workflow state.Approved parent scopeHighUse as boundary unless approval YAML changes it.
Strengths and weaknesses can be assessed from current repo and approved research artifacts.ProvisionalMediumCheck actual artifacts for present capabilities, not aspirations.
Opportunities and threats should be grounded in broader AI workflow, product discovery, and research repository evidence.Evidence-informed scope assumptionMediumValidate with current web sources during Stage 2.
Direct AFPS-specific market evidence may remain sparse.Known coverage riskMedium-highFlag direct-evidence gaps separately from adjacent-category evidence.
Approved Porter evidence can inform SWOT source coverage but should not substitute for SWOT-specific analysis.Process constraintHighUse Porter as context, not as the SWOT artifact.
Assumptions/confidence gate. Are these assumptions acceptable for beginning Stage 2?

Proposed Output Paths

PathStageAction NowAction After Approval
alignment/swot-afps-tracker.htmlStage 1Create review pageUpdate for Stage 2 artifact review after scope approval
research/afps-tracker/_working/preliminary-swot-research.mdStage 2Do not create yetCreate only after final compiled scope approval YAML
research/afps-tracker/competitive-analysis-swot.mdStage 3Do not create yetCreate only after artifact approval YAML
alignment/index.htmlIndexAdd this review pageKeep status current as the page advances
tasks/todo.md and tasks/roadmap.mdTask trackingRecord Stage 1 scope approval progressRecord verification and next gated state
Artifact destination and proposed file changes gate. Are these output paths and mutation boundaries approved?

Research Scope Approval Gates

This page should be approved only if the next step is allowed to perform synthesized SWOT research and write the non-canonical Stage 2 working packet. Feedback-only YAML may request revisions without answering every gate.

Pre-approval stop: The next action is review of this HTML page. Stage 2 does not start until final compiled YAML answers all required gates without unresolved needs-clarification, unresolved negative feedback, or other unresolved blocking changes.

Compile Review YAML

Use feedback-only YAML for emphasis requests, concerns, or clarification before final approval. Use final compiled answers when every required gate is answered.

Required questions remaining: 4