Idea Scope Brief — Omega War

Summary

Omega War is a browser-based 3D real-time strategy game built on Three.js, using Kenney CC0 assets as stand-in art. Setting: alternate history, Operation Unthinkable (~July 1945) — UK/Commonwealth, US, France, and re-armed German formations versus the Soviet Union and its satellite forces, Europe only.

The game has two layers:

• Tactical layer (Company of Heroes × Broken Arrow): company-scale real-time battles with cover, suppression, and capture points. Full base building is in scope and is integrated with the deck system: the deck defines the roster a player brings to battle, while in-battle buildings, resource gathering, and unlocks gate which deck units/upgrades can actually be deployed — deliberately recreating Steel Division-style phase escalation (recon/infantry first, armor and heavy support later) through the build order.
• Strategic layer (Tom Clancy's EndWar × Wargame: Red Dragon): a persistent European theater war map where tactical outcomes move front lines, with narrative-driven unit deployments constraining which forces are available in which battles.

Meta-systems: deck-building founded on historically-flavored divisions (Warno), persistent unit upgrades/veterancy between battles (EndWar barracks), and per-unit weapon/variant loadouts (Broken Arrow).

Problem Hypothesis

• No browser-accessible game combines deck-building wargame depth (Wargame, Warno, Broken Arrow) with CoH-style tactical combat and a persistent operational campaign. The genre lives exclusively in heavyweight desktop clients.
• The Operation Unthinkable scenario is nearly untouched by major RTS titles — the genre clusters on WW2 proper and the 1980s Cold War.
• For the creator: a passion project — the problem is "the game I want to play doesn't exist."

Beneficiary Hypothesis

• Primary: the developer — passion project, no commercial pressure assumed.
• Secondary: RTS/wargame fans (Wargame/Warno/Broken Arrow/CoH communities) who want this blend in a zero-install browser game; alternate-history enthusiasts.

Product Category Guess

Single-player real-time strategy/tactics hybrid (RTS + deck-builder + operational campaign layer), browser-delivered (Three.js/WebGL), with a desktop wrapper as an accepted fallback if browser performance falls short (rev 2).

Value Wedge

1. Setting: Operation Unthinkable 1945–46 is an unmined premise with strong faction flavor (including exile formations fighting their occupied homelands).
2. Mechanical hybrid: deck-as-roster fused with base building — buildings and resources unlock deck phases in-battle. Neither CoH (bases, no deck) nor Wargame/Broken Arrow (deck, no bases) does this; it reproduces Steel Division's phase pacing through player-driven build order instead of a timer.
3. Distribution: zero-install browser delivery in a genre that has none.
4. Persistence: divisions/decks evolve across the campaign via EndWar-style upgrades and Broken Arrow-style loadout variants.

Constraints

• Solo developer; greenfield repo (no code yet).
• Platform: browser-first (Three.js/WebGL) — instancing/LOD required; unit ceiling per battle to be proven. If web performance proves insufficient, desktop distribution is an acceptable fallback — an Electron/Tauri wrapper, up to a game-optimized Chromium build if needed. The Three.js codebase carries over either way, so this is a packaging decision, not a rewrite. (rev 2)
• Art: Kenney CC0 packs are stand-ins sourced from the user's GitHub asset mirrors (GeorgeQLe/assets-3d-city, assets-3d-nature, etc. — manifest.json per repo, CC0-1.0). No WW2-specific Kenney packs exist; vehicles/infantry are proxied from generic kits until a later art pass.
• Single-player architecture first; design the simulation cleanly (ideally deterministic) so multiplayer could be added later, but build no netcode now.
• Theater: Europe only.

Non-Goals

• Multiplayer/netcode (v1).
• Pacific/Asia theaters; naval combat as a core layer.
• Photorealism or milsim fidelity — stylized low-poly is the aesthetic.
• 1:1 historical simulation — "historically inspired," not accurate.
• Mobile/touch support; monetization.

Assumptions And Unknowns

Decided in interview: Central Europe historical split (swing-state events later); single-player first; tactical battle vertical slice first; full base building integrated with deck unlocks (Steel Division-like phases); Kenney stand-in art from the user's asset repos.

Open / riskiest:

• Fun hypothesis untested — the tactical slice exists to test it.
• The base-building × deck integration is novel and needs a real design spec (resource model, building tree, phase-gating rules).
• Browser performance ceiling unknown (units on screen, pathfinding cost); the perf spike decides browser-only vs desktop-wrapper distribution (rev 2).
• Faction pair for the first slice (suggest UK/Commonwealth vs USSR).
• Campaign-layer scope (EndWar map) is large and entirely unspecified.

ICP Readiness

Concept-level ambiguity is resolved; the idea is ready for /icp if a commercial path is ever pursued. Inputs for /icp: the secondary beneficiary hypotheses (desktop wargame communities, browser-game players, alt-history fans) and the browser-distribution wedge. However, as a stated passion project with the developer as primary beneficiary, formal ICP work may reasonably be skipped in favor of design/prototyping. Assumption to test first: the fun of the hybrid base/deck tactical loop — by building it. No marketplace/multi-sided structure apparent — single-sided product.

Next Steps

Primary: /pack recommend — personal game project, not a business app; per the user, a game-development-specific skills pack exists and is the expected routing target (rev 2) (business-discovery/ICP skippable unless commercial intent emerges).

Other options: design spec for the tactical vertical slice (combat model, deck/phase rules); Three.js performance spike (instanced units + pathfinding stress test); unit/division data schema draft (factions, divisions, units, loadouts).

Source coverage gaps: no web research performed (by design — this skill is pre-research); no performance measurements; no competitive scan of browser RTS titles. Rejected alternatives recorded in §2 (interview options not chosen: all-Soviet Central Europe, multiplayer-first, campaign-map-first slice, no-base-building models, fresh kenney.nl downloads).

Send feedback-only YAML any time (even with unanswered questions) to request revisions, or answer every required question and send the final compiled YAML to approve canonical writes.

Compile Feedback YAML Compile Answers

Copy YAML